JACKSON, NJ, USA
N1440L
BEECH T-34B
THE NIGHT TRAINING FLIGHT DEPARTED UNDER CONDITIONS OF A HAZY SKY, WITH A PRIVATE PILOT AND FLT INSTR ONBOARD. DUE TO REDUCED VISIBILITY, THE FLT INSTR DECIDED TO RETURN TO THE AIRPORT. HE INSTRUCTED THE PVT PILOT TO STAY ABOUT 500 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND AS THE AIRPLANE TURNED DOWNWIND OVER UNLIGHTED TERRAIN. THE PVT PILOT REPORTED THE FLT INSTR TOLD HIM HE WAS GAINING ALTITUDE AND HE, 'PUSHED THE NOSE OVER.' THE FLT INSTR THEN TOLD HIM, 'DON'T GO DOWN TOO FAST.' THE FLT INSTR TOOK CONTROL OF THE AIRPLANE AS IT PASSED THROUGH 200 FT AGL. IT STRUCK TREES ABOUT 100 FT HIGH, AND CAME TO REST ON THE GROUND, 600 FT LATER, UPRIGHT. NEITHER PILOT HAD FLOWN ANY NIGHT TIME IN THE PRECEDING 90 DAYS. THE FLT INSTR HAD LOGGED 3 HOURS OF INSTRUMENT TIME IN THE PRECEDING 90 DAYS.
On March 16, 1995, at 1915 eastern daylight time, a Beech T- 34B, N1440L, owned and operated by the U.S. Navy Flying Club, Lakehurst, New Jersey, struck trees in Jackson, New Jersey. The airplane was destroyed and the two pilots received serious injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a local VFR flight plan had been filed for the flight, which was operated under 14 CFR Part 91. The local training flight departed Lakehurst at 1909, intending to remain in the traffic pattern. The inflight visibility had been reported as restricted, therefore, the pilot requested the latest weather at McGuire AFB, located 12 NM west of west. The tower responded the McGuire was reporing 7 miles visibility, and the Lakehurst visibility was 4 miles with haze. At 1915:17, the Lakehurst Control Tower requested a position report from N1440L. There was no reply. The front seat pilot, who was receiving instruction stated: ...After the gear was up I noticed the nose light still on. We saw the haze that was in front of us. (As they were approaching the haze) Don said, "stay at this altitude to stay out of the haze and remain VFR (approx 600'[feet]). (I) started turning left to start downwind for runway 06, rolled out level. Over my left shoulder I thought I could see the runway lights. Don said I was gaining altitude and needed to watch the climb. I responded OK and pushed the nose over. Thought I saw what appeared to be the runway on my left. Don said, "don't go down too fast" his voice sounded excited over the ICS. Then I saw the trees in the passing light, the last thing I saw. The pilot had logged 27 hours of night time and 17 hours of instrument time, none in the preceding 90 days. In a written statement, the rear seat pilot and flight instructor said: Take off and climb to traffic pattern altitude (800'[feet]) was normal. We...made a left down wind turn and headed back to the field. During the down wind, I told Bob [front seat pilot] to go down to 500' [feet] but no lower. I looked out the window to see if I could see the lights of the runway. When I looked back in, we were below 300'[feet] and descending rapidly. I grabbed the stick, pulled it back and it was to late. Prior to impacting the trees, the flashing (anti-collision light) lit up the trees (peripheral vision). The aircraft was working well with no mechanical problems. I had been flying with Bob on other flights and he was a good pilot. Bob did the take off and down wind turn. [I] Though he could fly on instruments When asked, Were you ever in the clouds?, the pilot replied, "Never in the clouds or fog, it was misty." The flight instructor had logged 192 hours of night time, and 609 hours of instrument time. In the preceding 90 days, he had not logged any night time; however, he had logged 3 hours of instrument time in the preceding 90 days. The airplane came to rest upright, over 600 feet from the initial tree strike, in an unlighted area. The remote antenna on the ELT was separated from the ELT. On the following morning, the dual student manually activated the ELT, and extended the attached antenna. The signal was received by search aircraft and the airplane was located.
the flight instructor's attempt to maintain visual reference with the ground, and his delayed remedial action to the dual student's actions, which resulted in an inadvertent tree strike. Factors were the lack of recent night experience for both pilots, the haze, and dark night conditions.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
