GOOSE LAKE, IA, USA
N185F
CESSNA 180A
THE PILOT/OWNER WAS FLYING AN AIRPLANE THAT HAD RECENTLY UNDERGONE A COMPLETE OVERHAUL OF THE ENGINE AND REPLACEMENT OF THE RIGHT FUEL TANK BLADDER. AFTER BEING EN ROUTE FOR ABOUT 1 HOUR AND 50 MINUTES, THE ENGINE STOPPED RUNNING WITH NO WARNING. DURING A SUBSEQUENT FORCED LANDING IN A CORN FIELD, THE AIRPLANE NOSED OVER AND WAS DAMAGED. INSPECTION OF THE AIRPLANE REVEALED A WRINKLED RIGHT BLADDER FUEL TANK AND A FUEL STAIN AFT OF THE LEFT FUEL CAP. VERY LITTLE FUEL WAS FOUND ONBOARD. FOUR GALLONS OF FUEL WAS ADDED TO THE LEFT TANK AND THE ENGINE RAN SUCCESSFULLY. THE AIRPLANE HAD BEEN MODIFIED WITH SUPPLEMENTAL TYPE CERTIFICATE (STC) SA4121SW. HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO MAINTENANCE ENTRY IN THE AIRPLANE'S LOGBOOK REGARDING THE MAINTENANCE PERFORMED TO COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF THE STC. CESSNA SERVICE BULLETIN (SB) SEB88-1 WAS APPLICABLE TO THE STC. AN INSTRUCTION OF THE SB WAS ' . . . TO ADD A STRIP OF FOAM SEAL AROUND THE WING STRUT UNDER THE UPPER STRUT CUFF. THIS SEALING PREVENTS AIR FLOWING INSIDE THE CUFF AND DISRUPTION OF PROPER FUEL VENTING DUE TO VORTEX GENERATION FORWARD OF THE VENT TUBE . . .' THE SB ALSO NOTED THAT EXCESSIVE GAPS BETWEEN THE WING STRUT AND STRUT CUFF COULD CAUSE FUEL BLADDER TANK WRINKLING, UNSNAPPING AND INACCURATE FUEL QUANTITY INDICATIONS.
On October 26, 1995, at 1923 central daylight time, a Cessna 180A, N185F, operated and owned by an instrument rated commercial pilot, was substantially damaged following a loss of engine power and subsequent forced landing on a field near Clinton, Iowa. The pilot reported no injuries. No flight plan was on file. The personal 14 CFR Part 91 flight had departed Anoka County-Blaine- Janes Field, Minneapolis, Minnesota, at 1725, en route to Greater Peoria Regional Airport, Peoria, Illinois. From the pilot's written statement, the airplane had recently undergone a complete overhaul on the engine. He had fueled the airplane with five hours (65 gallons) of usable fuel and completed a satisfactory leak check before taking off. After one hour and fifty minutes en route at 4500 feet mean sea level (MSL), with the carburetor heat on, and the fuel selector on both tanks, the engine stopped with no warning. A forced landing was performed in a farm field with the airplane coming to rest inverted. A mechanic who inspected the airplane after the accident stated he turned the airplane back on to its wheels and found very little fuel onboard. No fuel came out of the carburetor inlet hose. The right fuel tank bladder was severely wrinkled and the left fuel cap had apparent fuel stains running aft. The fuel tank vent pipe was not plugged. He added four gallons of fuel to the left fuel tank and ran the engine successfully. The Federal Aviation Administration inspector's statement, said that the left fuel cap was loose when latched. Fuel stains were evident aft of the left cap. The right bladder fuel tank was crumpled up with three outboard fuel snaps found unsnapped. The pilot said that the right fuel tank was recently replaced. He said that a supplemental type certificate (STC)# SA4121SW that involves adding wing strut fairings and contour wing struts, was performed, but did not know who performed the work. This STC if installed reduces the flow separation at the junctions of the struts and fuselage. There was no maintenance entry in the airplane's logbook on STC #SA4121SW which also involves Cessna Service Bulletin SEB88-1, which states, "...to add a strip of foam seal around the wing strut under the upper strut cuff. This sealing prevents air flowing inside the cuff and disruption of proper fuel venting due to vortex generation forward of the vent tube, which is located immediately aft of the strut cuff... ." If the Cessna Service Bulletin SEB88-1 is not performed or performed incorrectly, there is a note that states, "...Note: Excessive gaps between the wing strut and strut cuff can cause fuel bladder tank wrinkling, unsnapping and inaccurate fuel quantity indications... ."
inadequate maintenance, inadequate preflight by the pilot, and a loose fuel tank cap that allowed siphoning of fuel, buckling of the right fuel bladder, fuel exhaustion, and loss of engine power. Factors relating to the accident were: darkness, and the soft terrain and crop in the emergency landing area.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
