LANAI CITY, HI, USA
N836FC
Piper PA-28-140
While practicing touch-and-go landings the pilot gave permission to his passenger to place his hands on the yoke. The purpose was to allow the passenger to feel what the pilot was doing during the flight. The passenger had been briefed that the pilot was going to raise the nose of the aircraft during the landing sequence. At this point, the passenger pushed the yoke forward and a struggle for the aircraft controls took place between the pilot and the passenger. The pilot was able to reestablish control of the aircraft before impacting the runway, but it resulted in a hard landing. When questioned by the pilot regarding his [the passenger's] actions during the landing, the passenger stated that he thought that the pilot needed his assistance in landing. The passenger reacted automatically when he perceived that the pilot was having trouble raising the nose of the aircraft. Witnesses to the accident reported that as the aircraft got close to the runway it dropped about 50 to 60 feet straight down to the ground. Both witnesses reported that weather was not a factor.
On October 11, 1997, at 1500 hours Hawaiian standard time, a Piper PA-28-140, N836FC, veered off runway 21 and overturned after making a hard landing at the Lanai City, Hawaii, airport, while practicing touch-and-go landings. The aircraft was owned by Helicopter Consultants of Maui, Inc., and was rented to the pilot. The aircraft sustained substantial damage. The airline transport rated pilot and non-rated passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions existed for the local personal flight which included calm wind conditions. The pilot reported that after takeoff from the first touch-and-go he gave his passenger ". . .permission to have a light touch on the yoke to enable him to feel what I was doing." Until he went to raise the nose for landing, the pilot had felt no pressure on the yoke from the passenger. "I had been explaining everything I was doing but when I told the passenger that I was raising the nose for landing he aggressively pushed the yoke forward. I was only able to pull the nose up before we impacted the runway." The pilot stated that he had asked his passenger why he had done that and the passenger explained to him that, ". . .he just reacted automatically because of his extensive experience flying ultra lights where you have to push out to raise the nose. He thought I was having trouble raising the nose because the yoke wasn't going in." The passenger stated that, "as we were on final, [the pilot] mentioned he [was] going to raise the nose. My hands were still on the yoke but I did not realize that I was pushing the nose down." The passenger further stated "My reflex and not allowing [the pilot] to pull on the yoke caused the plane to crash on the [runway]." Witnesses to the accident reported that as the aircraft got close to the runway it dropped about 50 to 60 feet straight down to the ground. Both witnesses reported that weather was not a factor in this accident.
Interference on the controls by the passenger as the aircraft neared touchdown, and the pilot's failure to adequately brief and supervise the passenger on the use and relinquishing of the flight controls. A factor in the accident was the intentional control interference of the passenger.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
