Aviation Accident Summaries

Aviation Accident Summary MIA00LA085

LOUISBURG, NC, USA

Aircraft #1

N69174

Cessna 152

Analysis

While over the threshold of the second touch-and-go landing with the flaps fully extended, the pilot flared too soon and the airplane began to float. The airplane then touched down and bounced. After becoming airborne the student pilot applied aft elevator control input but did not apply power. The airplane then stalled, impacted hard on the runway to the left of the runway centerline, bounced again, then touched down off the left side of the runway. An automated weather observation taken on the airport about 26 minutes after the accident indicates in part that the wind was from 280 degrees at 7 knots.

Factual Information

On February 7, 2000, about 1630 eastern standard time, a Cessna 152, N69174, registered to Challenge Air, Llc., operated by First in Flight Aviation, experienced collapse of the nose landing gear while landing at the Franklin County Airport, Louisburg, North Carolina. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed for the 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight. The student pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. The flight originated about 24 minutes earlier. The pilot stated that he was practicing touch-and-go landings in preparation for his first solo cross- country flight. He was on his second touch-and-go landing and had turned base and final. After crossing over the threshold with the flaps fully extended, he flared too soon and the airplane began to float. The airplane then touched down and bounced, and while airborne, he applied aft elevator control input but did not apply power. The airplane then stalled, impacted hard on the runway to the left of the runway centerline, then bounced and touched down a third time off the left side of the runway. The airplane also collided with a 2-3 foot high snowbank off the left side of the runway. An automated METAR weather observation taken on the airport about 26 minutes after the accident indicates in part that the wind was from 280 degrees at 7 knots.

Probable Cause and Findings

The improper recovery from the bounced landing by the pilot-in-command for his failure to apply power and inadvertent stall by the pilot-in-command resulting in a hard landing. A contributing factor was the total lack of experience of the pilot-in-command.

 

Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database

Get all the details on your iPhone or iPad with:

Aviation Accidents App

In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports