Circleville, OH, USA
N29930
North American AT-6D
During an airshow, the accident airplane flew by as the lead of a four-ship, single-file pass. When it reached the end of the runway, it began a climbing right turn, with an intended course reversal. Near the completion of the turn, the airplane suddenly rolled further right, the nose pitched down, and the airplane subsequently impacted the ground almost vertically. There were no mechanical anomalies noted.
On September 29, 2002, about 1430 eastern daylight time, a North American AT-6D, N29930, was destroyed when it impacted the ground while maneuvering at Pickaway County Memorial Airport (CYO), Circleville, Ohio. The certificated commercial pilot was fatally injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time. No flight plan had been filed for the local air show flight, which was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, witnesses reported that the airplane had previously made a pass as the lead of a four-ship echelon formation. The formation broke up, and the airplane then led the other three airplanes in a low level, single file pass along runway 01. When the airplane reached the end of the runway, it began a climbing turn, which was "noticeably slow compared to the other airplanes." The airplane climbed, stalled, and pitched downwards about 75 degrees nose-low before impacting a fallow cornfield. None of the witnesses heard any abnormal engine noises before or during the accident. The pilot of the second airplane stated that at the time of the accident, after the fly-by, the intent was to turn slightly to the left, to a heading of "north," then pitch up no more than 20 degrees, bank right to a southerly heading and descend back to the original altitude. When the accident airplane had nearly completed the turn at an estimated 800 feet above the ground, he saw it roll further right to an inverted position. It then descended to the ground nearly vertically, with the left wing "slightly low." The pilot of the second airplane felt that the accident airplane entered an accelerated stall. The pilot of the third airplane stated that his view was partially obscured by smoke emitted from the accident airplane and the number two airplane. His attention was drawn to the accident airplane "by the lack of movement of its shadow across the ground." Shortly thereafter, the shadow and the accident airplane "merged." The pilot of the fourth airplane reported that he did not witness the accident. His first indication of a problem was when he heard a "knock it off" call from one of the other remaining airplanes. The fourth pilot also reported that the accident flight was the second flight of the day, and was planned to be identical to the first flight. In addition, the pilots had physically walked through the maneuver sequence on the ramp. The planned course reversal where the accident occurred was not planned as a "high-g" turn, but more closely resembled a "dog-bone" maneuver. There was supposed to be an initial slight left turn with a shallow, 500-fpm climb, then a right turn to reverse course followed by a descent at the same rate. A witness on the ground, who controlled air and ground traffic for the air show, stated that the accident airplane passed by him, then turned north of a farm house to come back for another pass. The accident airplane made a steep turn of "60 degrees or more," then "leveled out" and was heading southeast when it "[went] up and left wing over (in a stall) configuration." The airplane then descended, "almost vertical into the ground." The left wing struck the ground first, and the airplane exploded. Another witness on the ground stated that after the airplane made a low level pass, it "started to gain altitude and make a right turn." It then went "nose down" and straight into the ground. The pilot of the fourth airplane described the stall characteristics of the T-6 as "honest." During a full stall, the airplane would break right four out of five times, and directional control could be "easily maintained with rudder input throughout the stall maneuver." After the accident, he practiced multiple stalls and recoveries, and even held continuous back pressure on the control stick. Directional control was maintained, and recovery was made by releasing the back pressure. According to the FAA inspector, all flight control surfaces were accounted for at the accident scene, and there were no ground scars other than those directly below the wreckage. The cockpit and much of the wing area were consumed by fire. Both of the airplane's wings had leading edge crushing, aft to the spars, about 90 degrees perpendicular to the chord line. The propeller blades had leading edge nicks, and one blade tip was curled back "like a ram's horn." The pilot held a commercial certificate with ratings for airplane single engine land and instrument airplane. The pilot's logbooks were not recovered. The pilot's latest FAA second class medical certificate was issued on August 7, 2002. At the time, he reported 2,400 hours of total flight time. According to the local coroner's office, no autopsy was performed due to the condition of the remains. Toxicological specimens were provided to the FAA Toxicology and Accident Research Laboratory, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; however, "no suitable specimens in sufficient amounts were submitted for analysis." Weather, recorded at an airport about 20 nautical miles to the north, about the time of the accident, included clear skies and calm winds.
The pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed during the course reversal, which resulted in an inadvertent stall/spin.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
