Payson, AZ, USA
N644AW
Airbus Industrie A320-321
About 25,000 feet during climb out, a flight attendant was injured during an encounter with moderate turbulence. The flight attendant was out of her seat in the aft galley preparing to provide cabin service. The flight crew deviated to the closest airport, the flight attendant was transported to the hospital, and the flight departed 30 minutes later for its intended destination. Prior to departure, the captain was provided with a weather package that indicated there would be a buildup of cumulonimbus clouds and thunderstorm activity up to 33,000 feet along their route of flight. During the climb out, the flight crew reported visually seeing the cumulus buildup, and verified it via their onboard weather radar. The flight crew asked for, and received, an ATC clearance to deviate to the right around the building cumulonimbus clouds. The deviation to the right of course placed the flight's path directly downwind of the buildups and potentially in the vicinity of turbulent eddies. The in-flight turbulence event occurred after the flight diverted around a primary buildup and entered into a secondary buildup that was partially masked by the primary buildup.
On June 5, 2003, at 1528 mountain standard time (MST), an Airbus Industries A320-321, N644AW, experienced an in-flight encounter with turbulence over Payson, Arizona. America West Airlines, Inc., operated the airplane as flight 402 under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 121 as a scheduled domestic passenger flight. The airplane was not damaged. The airline transport pilot rated captain, first officer, 2 flight attendants, and 136 passengers were not injured. The third flight attendant received serious injuries when she broke her foot during the turbulence event. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the cross-country flight to the Bradley International Airport (BDL), Windsor Locks, Connecticut. An instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan had been filed. The flight departed Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX), Phoenix, Arizona, at 1512. According to the captain's statement, while on climb out to FL250 (25,000 feet), he requested to deviate around significant cumuliform cloud buildup. Air Traffic Control (ATC) granted the deviation request. The pilot flying (PF) used the autopilot to make a turn to the right. During the deviation, the flight crew noted an auxiliary buildup of cumuliform on radar. They continued the deviation to avoid both cells, and reset the heading on the autopilot. The captain estimated the distance to the second cell to be less than 10 nm. The crew disconnected the autopilot to expedite the turn. The captain reported that they disconnected the autopilot because he could not rely on the autopilot to assist with compliance with the altitude clearance they had received. The PF noted the altitude at FL250. The captain stated that they encountered moderate turbulence in the vicinity of a secondary buildup. He stated that the nature of the turbulence was, "sudden and sharp." About 10 minutes later, the lead flight attendant (FA) notified the flight crew of the injury to the third flight attendant. The lead FA indicated that the other attendant fell as a result of the turbulence. The flight crew attempted to notify the airline's PHX station for about 10 minutes. When they were unable to contact the PHX station they went to an alternate radio (ARINC) frequency and reported the injury. The airline's System Operations Control (SOC) recommended that the flight continue to BDL. The flight crew notified the cabin crew about continuing on to BDL. Initially they all agreed to continue the flight. However, after further discussion, the flight crew contacted SOC and informed them that the injury was more severe than they had originally thought. The flight crew requested permission to divert to the nearest airport, Denver International Airport (DEN), Denver, Colorado, for medical attention. The captain also stated that they did not initially anticipate any weather problems during climb out. However, the seatbelt signs were illuminated (ON), and the radar was on, and identifying weather returns. In the first officer's written statement, he reported that while on the Siloh 1 departure from PHX there was an area of convective weather that was observed visually and confirmed via the on-board weather radar. The flight was deviating around the convective activity, and while climbing through 25,000 feet, they encountered about 3 - 5 seconds of what he characterized as moderate turbulence. According to the flight attendants, they received a briefing from the cabin prior to the passengers boarding the airplane. The flight crew did not mention any significant weather. No problems were noted with the takeoff. Minutes before the turbulence event, the flight crew made their welcoming announcements, which included a statement indicating that the seat belt sign would remain illuminated as there "may be some light turbulence on the climb out." In the injured FA's written incident statement, she indicated that the flight crew "gave us 2 bells indicating it was safe to get up." The injured FA was standing in the aft galley preparing to provide cabin service with another FA when the turbulence event took place. The dispatch weather package provided from SOC to the captain predicted a 20-mile-wide line of cumulous buildup moving from 310 degrees at 15 knots with cloud tops at 33,000 feet (FL330). The package also included SIGMETS, which read in part, "convective SIGMET 2W, valid until 2255Z (1555 MST) from 50 miles WNW of Winslow, AZ to 50 miles WSW of St. Johns." Per company policy, the captain provided a predeparture briefing that included weather conditions to the lead FA. No special emphasis was placed on anticipated weather en route. During climb out, the FO advised the passengers that the seatbelt sign would remain on "for a few more minutes as the flight might experience flight turbulence in the climb." The operator reported that the flight crew did not receive any weather updates, and the flight crew reported that they received no weather updates from other aircraft in the area prior to the turbulence event. A senior meteorologist for the National Transportation Safety Board prepared a report for the incident area. The southwest section of the National Weather Service (NWS) surface analysis chart showed a low-pressure system that extended west to northwest from the low over the California and Arizona border. Another low-pressure system was identified over the southwest section of New Mexico with a trough that extended northwest into the eastern portion of Arizona. A stationary front was identified east of the low-pressure system that ran north-to-south across New Mexico into southwest Texas. According to the Safety Board meteorologist, the turbulence incident occurred in-between the two low-pressure systems. The closest official weather reporting facility was Winslow-Lindberg Regional Airport (INW), Winslow, Arizona, located 1 mile west of Winslow, and about 54 miles north-northeast of Payson, at 4,941 feet. A special weather observation issued at 1505 reported wind from 200 degrees at 16 knots gusting to 22 knots; visbility unrestriced at 10 miles; sky clear below 12,00 feet, temperature 27 degrees Celcius; dew point 1 degree Celsisus; altimeter 29.97 inches of Mercury (inHg). The remarks section of the aviation routine weather report (METAR) reported that the thunderstoms sensor was inoperative. Upper air data values were obtained from the NWS Flagstaff Forecast Office (KFSX), site number 72376, located about 20 miles northeast of Payson. Several cloud layers were noted between 18,000 feet to 41,000 feet, with a relative humidity in excess of 60 percent. The sounding indicated a maximum upward vertical velocity or updraft strength of 44 knots. According to the meteorologist, the expected maximum wind gust (T2) and Windex microburst index parameters were favorable for high-based thunderstorm conditions with wind gusts from 55 to 68 knots, respectively. Satellite data imagery from the Geostationary Operations Environmental Satellite number 10 (GOES-10) at 1532, depicted an area of cumulus and cumulonimbus clouds that extended from Prescott through Flagstaff to Winslow, and then southeast towards the Show Low area. The visible imagery from GOES-10 at 1532, showed cumulus to cumulonimbus clouds forming northwest through the north and east of the Payson area along the Mogollon rim in the immediate vicinity of where the flight crew requested to deviate right of course around weather. The airplane's flight track was immediately downwind of towering cumulus clouds. According to the senior meteorologist, there were no severe weather forecast alerts, SIGMET's, AIRMET's, or center weather advisories current over Arizona at the time of the accident. The NWS Aviation Weather Center issued Convective SIGMET 2W at 1355, valid until 1522. The information was provided to the flight crew. The area covered in the Convective SIGMET was along the route of flight. The advisory identified and navigation fixes from 50 miles west-northwest of Winslow, to 50 miles west-southwest of St. Johns, Arizona, and was issued for a line of thunderstorms. The thunderstorms were 20 miles wide moving from 310 degrees at 15 knots with cloud tops at 33,000 feet. Convective SIGMENT 4W issued at 1455, contained an advisory that was valid until 1655 for portions of Arizona. The advisory identified navigation fixes from 30 miles northwest of Prescott, to 20 miles west-northwest of Winslow, to 40 miles southwest of St. Johns, and was issued for a line of thunderstorms. The thunderstorms were 20 miles wide moving from 310 degrees at 25 knots, with cumulonimbus cloud tops at 37,000 feet. The line of thunderstorms extended northwest through east of the Payson area along the route of America West's flight path. Albuquerque Center Weather Service Unit issued a Meteorological Impact Statement at 1246, valid until 2030. Thunderstorms were expected to remain isolated to widely scattered over the Arizona rim and New Mexico Gila region, with diminishing activity by 1830. The entire advisory was available to the America West flight dispatch office for flight planning use. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued Advisory Circular (AC 00-24B) titled Thunderstorms in 1983, where information is provided concerning the hazards associated with thunderstorms. In part, some of the avoidance rules identified by the FAA are: Do avoid by at least 20 miles any thunderstorm identified as severe or giving an intense radar echo. This is especially true under the anvil of large cumulonimbus. Do clear the top of a known or suspected severe thunderstorm by at least 1,000 feet altitude for each 10 knots of wind speed at the cloud top. This should exceed the altitude capability of most aircraft. Do circumnavigate the entire area if the area has 6/10 thunderstorm coverage. Do regard as extremely hazardous any thunderstorm with tops 35,000 feet or higher whether the top is visually sighted or determined by radar.
The flight's encounter with convectively induced turbulence associated with developing thunderstorms while the flight crew attempted to deviate around an area of adverse weather. The turbulence event occurred while the crew was attempting to maneuver around the identified primary buildup, and a secondary system that was partially masked by the primary cell visually and on radar was encountered.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
