Ketchikan, AK, USA
N345KA
de Havilland DHC-2
The float-equipped airplane was departing from a remote bay 20 miles north of Ketchikan, Alaska, to return air taxi passengers to Ketchikan after a ground tour. The accident pilot, who reported that he had 17,000 flight hours and 7,000 hours in the make and model of the accident airplane, said that southeasterly winds had begun to increase while he was waiting at the bay for the passengers to return from the tour. He said that, unlike when he had landed about 2.5 hours earlier, it was no longer "nice and calm" when the passengers returned. The pilot noticed choppy waves in parts of a nearby cove. To avoid some of the wind and waves, the pilot elected to take off toward the interior of the bay, in the direction of rising terrain. The pilot said that he had never taken off in that direction before. The pilot also said that he had intended to make a shallow, right-climbing turn toward the mouth of the bay and away from the terrain, but shortly after takeoff, he saw numerous choppy waves concentrated along his proposed departure flightpath, which he said indicated to him that strong winds were likely along that path. The pilot decided to change his plan and continue flying straight temporarily, away from the waves, and to make a left, 180-degree turn inside the bay, which was surrounded by high terrain. The pilot indicated that when the turn was initiated, the airplane was about 400 feet above the water, and he did not recall the indicated airspeed. The attempted 180-degree turn was within the airplane’s performance capabilities but placed it closer to rising terrain. While attempting this turn, the pilot encountered a downdraft, was unable to climb above the terrain, and stalled the airplane about 60 feet above the ground. The downdraft likely made it more difficult to avoid descending into the rising terrain. A weather study by the National Transportation Safety Board confirmed that there was a gust front in the area and an abrupt wind change about the time of the accident. Pilots flying nearby also reported low-level windshear, strong winds, and turbulence. No mechanical anomalies were discovered during postaccident inspections by the Safety Board.
HISTORY OF FLIGHT On August 16, 2007, about 1730 Alaska daylight time, a float-equipped de Havilland DHC-2 (Beaver) airplane, N345KA, was destroyed by impact and a postimpact fire when it collided with tree-covered terrain, about 20 miles north of Ketchikan, Alaska. The airplane was being operated as a visual flight rules (VFR) sightseeing flight under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 135, when the accident occurred. The airplane was owned and operated by Seawind Aviation, Inc., Ketchikan, Alaska. Of the nine people aboard, the airline transport pilot and three passengers sustained serious injuries, and five passengers died at the scene. A sixth passenger died of her injuries 48 days after the accident. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and company flight following procedures were in effect. At the time of the accident, the flight was returning to the operator's base at the Ketchikan Harbor Seaplane Base, Ketchikan. The flight was a sightseeing flight for cruise ship passengers. The passenger's cruise ship was docked in Ketchikan, and the accident flight was the last flight of the day following a bear viewing tour in an area known as Traitor's Cove. During an initial emergency room interview with an Alaska State Trooper on August 16, a passenger stated that at the completion of the 2-hour long bear-viewing tour, the group retuned to the airplane for the flight to Ketchikan. The passenger reported strong and gusty winds prior to beginning the takeoff run. She said that the airplane started its takeoff run directly into the strong winds, and shortly after becoming airborne, it made a steep turn to the left. The passenger indicated that as the airplane turned left, it abruptly descended, and collided with a tall stand of trees along the shoreline of the bay. During the impact, the right wing was severed, and the airplane's fuselage came to rest on its right side. The passenger said that a postaccident fire ensued about 30 seconds after the collision, which consumed the airplane's cabin area and fuselage. Pilots flying in the area about the time of the accident reported strong southeasterly winds, ranging between 30 and 40 knots, with significant downdraft activity. As a result of the accident, the pilot sustained serious burn injuries, and was flown from Ketchikan by air ambulance to a hospital in Seattle, Washington. On September 5 and 6, 2007, once the pilot's condition had improved, the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) operations group chairman, and an NTSB human factors investigator, interviewed the pilot in his hospital room. The pilot reported the arrival at Traitors Cove was normal, and that he waited at the airplane while the passengers took the bear-viewing ground tour. He noted that the weather was beautiful, with hardly any wind, but that while he was waiting for his passengers, the weather changed. He said that he could tell that the wind at higher altitudes was getting blustery, and could tell the direction of the wind, but not the magnitude. There was no rain or convective activity, and the only change he noted was that it "just wasn't as nice and flat calm anymore." He said he took off into the southeasterly wind, with the intent of making a shallow, right climbing turn toward the mouth of the bay, away from rising terrain. However, during the takeoff run, he indicated that there were numerous 3-foot choppy waves concentrated along his proposed departure flight path, and he decided to continue straight ahead, toward the mouth of the bay, and then make a left, 180-degree turn inside the bay. He said he had never seen the wind "blowing that hard out of the lake like that." About 400 feet agl, and about 90 degrees into his intended 180-degree left turn, the pilot said, in part, "the bottom started to fall out fast." He indicated that the left bank was "not much, less than 30, 25 degrees." He said that he added engine power and more flaps while holding back elevator, but the airplane continued to descend. He said that the airplane stalled about 60 feet above the ground, just before contacting the tops of the trees. The airplane collided with trees and descended to the ground. The engine was torn off the fuselage, and a fire began immediately near the front of the airplane. The pilot stated that there were no preaccident mechanical anomalies with the accident airplane. PERSONNEL INFORMATION Pilot Information The pilot held an airline transport pilot certificate with airplane multiengine land and sea ratings. In addition, he held commercial pilot privileges with airplane single-engine land and sea ratings. His most recent second-class medical certificate was issued March 8, 2007, and contained the limitation that he must wear correcting lenses. He reported that his flight experience was about 17,000 total flight hours, of which about 7,000 hours were in the accident airplane make and model. In the 30 days before the accident, he flew about 180 hours. His flight time in the previous 90 days was 467 hours, and about 580 hours in the previous year. His most recent CFR Part 135.293 check ride was on April 17, 2007. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) operations inspector from the Juneau Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) administered the check ride in the accident airplane. Flight and duty records for the pilot revealed that his annual/quarterly record keeping began in January 2007. From January 2007, through March 2007, the pilot flew a total of 11 days, with the remainder as days off. From April 2007, through June 2007, the pilot flew 57 days, and had 35 days off. Beginning on May 12, he flew every day for the next 63 days, until his most recent day off from flying on July 14. He then flew every day for the next 33 days until the accident. Company Information The pilot was the owner of the company, and held a Part 135 single-pilot operator air taxi certificate. He was responsible for operational control of the company's only airplane. The pilot's wife assisted him in the company's day-to-day business needs. As a single-pilot operator, the company was not required to have an operating manual, a formal training program, a director of maintenance, director of operations, or a chief pilot. The company operations specifications, issued by the FAA's Juneau FSDO, specified that all weather reports and forecasts would be obtained from the National Weather Service (NWS), a source approved by the NWS, or other sources approved by the FAA. For VFR operations, the pilot's own observations, or those of another competent observer, could be used when approved sources were not available. AIRPLANE INFORMATION The airplane was equipped with a Pratt & Whitney R-985 radial engine that was rated at 450 horsepower. Originally, the airplane's maximum gross weight was 5,090 pounds, but it had been modified to 5,500 pounds. The airplane was equipped with Edo 4930 floats. The airplane was not equipped with a cockpit voice recorder, or a flight data recorder, nor was it required to be. Maintenance records revealed that the last recorded inspection event of the engine and airframe was a 100-hour inspection, completed on August 14, 2007, 2 days before the accident. At that time, the airplane had a total 22,409 service hours, and the engine had 1,070 service hours since the last major overhaul. The most recent annual inspection of the engine and airframe was on March 9, 2007, at which the airplane had 21,974 service hours, and the engine had 635 service hours since a major overhaul. An engine overhaul was done by Tulsa Aircraft Engines, Inc., on October 17, 2005. The engine was installed on the accident airplane on March 23, 2006, and it remained there until the accident. The airplane had a stall warning system, which incorporated a horn and a red light mounted on the instrument panel that warned the pilot of an approaching stall. A sensing vane on the leading edge of the left wing activated the warning horn and light at the onset of a stall. According to the performance information section of the airplane's FAA approved flight manual, the stall speed for a DHC-2 airplane configured with the recommended takeoff flap setting of 35 degrees, operating at 4,658 pounds (the estimated gross weight of the airplane at the time of the accident), ranges between 58 and 81 miles per hour, depending on bank angle. The airplane was equipped with various FAA-approved modifications since its original manufacture in 1959. These modifications were incorporated using FAA-approved supplemental type certificates (STC). Sealand Aviation Jump Seats, STC SA01380NY The airplane was originally equipped with seven seats that incorporated two front seats, three seats across at the rear doors, and a two-seat, fold-down hammock style seat attached to the aft fuselage bulkhead. At the time of the accident, the airplane was equipped with a Sealand Aviation jump seat kit, which adds two additional seats to the aft bulkhead, allowing a total of nine seats. Flight Manual Supplement FMS 7967-3 authorized the use of up to nine seats. The most aft seats had two seating positions, with a collective weight limit of 195 pounds. The aft seat, if occupied by two persons, required that the occupants sit side-by-side. The aft seat, if occupied by one person, required that the occupant sit in the middle of the seat. Sealand Aviation Ltd., Baggage Extension, STC SA00094NY This modification was a baggage area extension kit, which accommodated the installation of the two additional jumps seats referenced above. Kenmore Air Harbor, Edo Floats, STC SA1913WE Provided for the installation of EDO 679-4930 floats. Kenmore Air Harbor Inc., Sea Fins, STC SA456NW This modification provided for the installation of seaplane fins. These were small vertical stabilizers installed on the upper and lower surfaces at each end of the left and right horizontal stabilizer. Viking Air Ltd., Gross Weight Increase, STC SA00299NY This modification allowed DHC-2 operators to increase the gross weight from 5,090 pounds, to 5,500 pounds with EDO 679-4930 floats installed. The STC required the installation of a stall warning system consisting of a stall warning horn, and stall warning light on the instrument panel. An initial review of the gross weight increase STC revealed that the ventral fin on the underside of the empennage was considered optional when the Kenmore Air Harbor seaplane fins were installed, and a ventral fin was not installed on the accident airplane. On March 27, 2008, a representative from Viking Air Ltd., confirmed that a ventral fin on the underside of the empennage is considered "optional" when the Kenmore Air Harbor seaplane fins are installed. He noted that the ventral fin provides additional lateral stability when operating at low airspeeds, and when the airplane is operated at a gross weight between 5,090 and 5,500 pounds, or within the provisions of the gross weight increase STC. On June 12, 2008, a Viking Air Ltd. representative reported that a detailed review of the engineering data surrounding STC SA00299NY revealed that the ventral fin was in fact required when the 5,500 pound gross weight modification was in use, with Edo 4930 floats installed. He noted that the language in revision number 4 of the installation instructions, issued on September 15, 2004, was misleading, and implied that the ventral fin on the underside of the empennage was not required, but optional. He noted that Viking Air Ltd. is correcting the language for the installation of the ventral fin. In a letter to the NTSB dated June 20, 2008, a Viking Air Ltd. representative noted that since the accident airplane was operating below 5,090 pounds, and within the airplane's normal gross weight envelope, no adverse flight characteristics would have been encountered during the accident flight with the absence of the ventral fin. A senior aeronautical engineer from the FAA's Anchorage Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) reported that he reviewed STC approvals for de Havilland DHC-2 airplanes equipped with EDO 4930 floats and Kenmore seaplane fins, and concurred with Viking Air Ltd. findings. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION The closest weather reporting facility was the Ketchikan International Airport, 20 miles south of the accident site. About 23 minutes after the accident, at 1753, a weather observation from the Ketchikan Airport was reporting, in part: Wind, 140 degrees (true) at 17 knots, gusting to 31 knots; visibility, 10 statute miles; clouds and sky condition, few at 1,700 feet, 4,500 feet scattered, 11,000 feet scattered; temperature, 63 degrees F; dew point, 54 degrees F; altimeter, 29.86 inches Hg. Remarks; peak wind 140 degrees at 30 knots occurred at 1752, blowing dust east at the end of the runway, Harbor wind, 120 degrees at 14 knots, gusting to 20 knots. After the accident, a pilot that departed from the same area as the accident airplane, reported strong gusty winds, estimated to be 35 to 40 knots, from the southeast. She said that she took off crosswind, toward the outlet of Margaret Bay, and indicated that she used that strategy because it was "too scary," and she was "too much of a chicken" to do a departure path toward the head of the bay, which was the accident airplane's departure route. Another pilot that responded to Traitors Cove to assist with evacuation of the accident airplane's occupants reported that when he arrived, the winds in the cove were from the southeast about 20 knots, with gusts to 25 knots. A senior NTSB meteorologist did a comprehensive study of the weather conditions around the accident site, revealing a strong marine layer inversion and an abrupt wind change associated with the passage of a thunderstorm gust. The study disclosed that the forecast for the Ketchikan area included increasing instabilities over the region that were expected to produce rain showers and isolated afternoon thunderstorms, with the threat of small hail and strong gusty winds, which is an uncommon weather event for the area. The NTSB meteorologist reviewed archived satellite imagery, captured about the time of the accident, which revealed evidence of a gust front traveling northward, and towards the accident site. He reported that a review of surface observations from the Ketchikan Airport noted a sudden increase in southeasterly winds, with a pressure jump, coupled with a 10-degree temperature drop, which is consistent with a gust front. Reports from other pilots flying in the surrounding area, reported encountering low-level wind shear, strong gusty winds, and severe turbulence at lower altitudes. About 1759, the pilot of de Havilland DHC-3 airplane reported winds from 120 degrees at 30 knots, with peak gusts to 40 knots, about 15 miles west of Ketchikan. The NTSB meteorologist also noted that historically, thunderstorms are not normal events in Alaska, with an average of only 1.10 thunderstorm days a year reported in the Ketchikan area. A copy of the meteorologist's report is included in the public docket of this accident. COMMUNICATIONS After the airplane departed Ketchikan, there were no reports of communications with the pilot. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION Two investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) Alaska Regional Office traveled to the accident site and examined the airplane wreckage on August 17 and 18. All of the airplane's major components were found at the main wreckage site. A path of wreckage debris, from an area of broken trees to the wreckage point of rest, was on a magnetic heading of 350 degrees. (All heading/bearings noted in this report are oriented toward magnetic north.) The airplane collided with trees along the shoreline, and continued inland into an area of heavily wooded rolling terrain. Several trees were broken and toppled at the wreckage site. With the exception of separated portions of the airframe, and the airplane's vertical stabilizer, a postcrash fire incinerated the airplane. The first piece of airplane wreckage discovered along the debris path was the severed
An inadvertent aerodynamic stall resulting from the pilot's poor decision-making and inadequate planning and execution when he took off toward nearby rising terrain, in strong winds, under circumstances where his options for maneuvering were severely limited and where his safety margin was, thus, insufficient.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
