Tehachapi, CA, USA
N497E
BELL OH-58A
The intent of the public aircraft flight was to transport an injured dog from the Sheriff Department's K-9 division to an urgent care facility after it had been shot while on duty. After arriving at the Sheriff's Air Support Unit (ASU) headquarters about 0100, the pilot discussed the weather conditions with the on-duty command pilot and confirmed that visual meteorological conditions prevailed at both the departure and arrival airports. He was aware that a weather front was moving through the area and that he would likely encounter instrument meteorological conditions while en route. Therefore, he planned to use an airport about halfway along the route as a backup landing site if the weather conditions deteriorated. The pilot's decision to attempt the flight with known deteriorating weather conditions was likely due to self-induced pressure to complete the flight because of the dog's injury. The departure was uneventful, but, as the helicopter approached the alternate airport, it encountered light rain, strong wind, low clouds, and fog. The pilot decided to proceed and see if the helicopter could traverse a pass east of the airport. However, once the flight got beyond the lights of the city, the pilot lost all visual reference after flying into clouds; the helicopter was about 500 ft above ground level at this time. He decided to slow the helicopter and initiate a gradual descent to exit the clouds. Unknown to the pilot, the windshield had misted up due to a water leak, which limited the effectiveness of the night vision goggles (NVG) that he and the tactical flight officer (TFO) were using for the flight. During the descent, the TFO realized that the windshield had fogged up because he could still see out of the side window, and the pilot turned on the de-mister. Shortly after, a highway came into view, and the helicopter struck its surface about 5 miles past the alternate airport. The helicopter bounced and then rotated about 180 degrees. It appeared to be handling normally, so the pilot chose to return to the alternate airport. Upon landing, he discovered that the helicopter had sustained substantial damage. The weather conditions at the alternate airport were below the ASU minimums both before takeoff and during the flight. However, the ASU did not have formal risk assessment procedures in effect. The weather conditions at night and the misted windshield would have been conducive to the pilot's experiencing spatial disorientation. Although the helicopter was equipped with a radar altimeter, its audible and visual alert functions were turned off at the time of the accident. If the pilot had used the radar altimeter, it would have given him an opportunity to react when the helicopter reached or descended below a predetermined altitude. The pilot, who was also the ASU's chief flight instructor, admitted that the typical effectiveness of the NVGs likely led to complacency on his part. The pilot had been working the day leading up to the accident and had been awake for about 16 hours. He reported that he was about 2 hours into restful sleep when he was woken to perform the mission. Therefore, he attained minimal rest for the mission, which was performed during a time when he would otherwise be asleep and likely degraded his performance and decision-making ability.
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn March 27, 2014, at 0147 Pacific daylight time, a Bell OH-58A, N497E, collided with a highway near Tehachapi, California, after encountering instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). The helicopter was registered to, and operated by, the Kern County Sheriff's Department as a public aircraft flight. The commercial pilot, tactical flight officer (TFO), single passenger, and a dog from the Sheriff's K-9 division were not injured. The helicopter sustained substantial damage during the accident sequence. The cross-country flight departed Meadows Field Airport, Bakersfield, California, at 0121, with a planned destination of General William J Fox Airfield, Lancaster, California. Marginal visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the accident site, and a company flight plan had been filed. The purpose of the flight was to transport the dog to an urgent care facility in Lancaster, after it was shot while on duty about 3 hours prior to the accident. According to the K9 Unit Supervisor, the local veterinarian could not perform treatment due to the nature of the dog's injuries. The pilot stated that he arrived at the Air Support Unit (ASU) headquarters in Bakersfield about 0100, and was briefed on both the mission and en route weather by the current on-duty command pilot (who was coming to the end of his shift). The accident pilot confirmed that visual meteorological conditions (VMC) prevailed at both the departure and arrival airports. He was aware that a weather front was moving through the area, and that he would most likely encounter instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) while en route. He planned to use Tehachapi airport, about 45 miles east of Bakersfield, as an alternate landing site should conditions deteriorate. At 0120, they loaded the dog into the rear left footwell, along with the K-9 Division Chief who was seated in the rear right seat. The departure was uneventful, but as they approached Tehachapi they encountered light rain, strong winds, and low clouds. Both the pilot and the TFO were wearing Night Vision Goggles (NVG's) throughout the flight. The pilot decided to proceed, and wanted to see if Sand Canyon, east of Tehachapi, was passable. However, once they got beyond the lights of the city, he lost visual reference after flying into what he thought was clouds. He reported flying about 500 feet above ground level (agl) at that time, and was concerned that returning might cause them to collide with wind turbines and other obstacles in the area. He elected to slow the helicopter and initiate a gradual descent with the hope of exiting the clouds. During the descent he realized that the windshield had fogged up, and he turned on the demister. A short time later a highway came into view and the helicopter struck the ground. The TFO reported similar observations stating that as soon as they launched, cloud cover started to descend into the area, and he could see clouds in the mountain passes ahead. They maintained visual contact along the route but as they approached Tehachapi, the area became further enveloped in clouds. The cloud deck at their location was about 600 feet agl and he could neither see a break nor an exit route. Looking ahead towards the northeast he observed the cement plant at Monolith, and a break in the clouds beyond near Highway 58. He communicated this to the pilot, and as they flew past the cement plant, his forward vision became completely obscured. He could still see out of the side window, so assumed the windshield had fogged up (it often did during rain because of a leak). The pilot then turned on the demister, and the TFO perceived that the helicopter was now performing gradual S-turns over the highway. He did not get the sense that they were descending, and he continued to look out of the right window, telling the pilot that they were clear of obstructions. He continued to move his head back and forth observing the front and side windows; however, the front windshield was still obscured. A few seconds later he looked out of the right window, and although he could not sense movement, they appeared to be rapidly descending. They transitioned over the eastbound lanes of the highway, and he immediately called for the pilot to pull up, however, a few seconds later the helicopter struck the ground. The helicopter struck the surface of the westbound lane of Highway 58, bounced back into the air, and rotated about 180 degrees. The pilot maintained a low hover and could now see the lights of Tehachapi ahead. The helicopter appeared to be handling normally, and was not vibrating or making any unusual sounds, so he elected to return to Tehachapi Airport, 5 miles to the west. Before landing he asked the TFO to open the door to observe the skids; they appeared intact. The TFO attempted to utilize the Forward Looking Infrared Camera (FLIR) mounted on the nose, and rear-mounted "Nightsun" searchlight to assist with the landing, but they were both inoperative. The helicopter then landed uneventfully. Subsequent examination revealed that the helicopter sustained substantial damage to the belly structure, with the skids having been spread about 2 feet beyond their normal stance. The FLIR and searchlight were both disabled, and sustained crush damage to their lower cowlings, and the tailskid appeared to have struck the ground. The helicopter was equipped with an AeroComputers Digital Mapping System. The system recorded the helicopters GPS track at approximately 1-second intervals. The data for the accident flight revealed a track that closely matched the crew's statements. The helicopter maintained a southeast track for the majority of the flight, generally following Highway 58. The projected flight track beyond the accident site would have taken the helicopter through a pass which was flanked immediately to the north and south by wind turbine-covered peaks, at elevations ranging between 1,000 and 2,000 ft above the highway. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot was the chief flight instructor for the ASU. He stated that he had been flying fixed wing aircraft since 1975, and helicopters since 1980. His flight experience was primarily within the fields of electronic news gathering, emergency medical service, and law enforcement. He held an airline transport pilot certificate with ratings for helicopter-rotorcraft, along with a commercial certificate with ratings for airplane single engine land, multiengine land, and instrument airplane. He also held a flight instructor certificate with ratings for helicopter. He reported a total flight experience in all aircraft of 16,110 hours, with 6,193 in the accident make and model. He had flown for 14 hours during the preceding 30 days, three of which were in the accident make and model. The pilot held a second-class medical certificate issued on September 24, 2014. It had no limitations or waivers. The TFO did not hold a pilots certificate. The pilot submitted a sleep and activity log for the 72-hour period leading up to the accident. Each day he went to sleep at 2130, and woke at 0530. Although he was on duty from 0800 to 1600 on both prior days, he did not fly on the day before the accident. He was awakened by a phone call from the ASU at 0015 on the day of the accident, and reported for duty at 0100. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe helicopter was manufactured by Bell Helicopters in October 1970 and delivered to the United States Army at the end of that month. After being retired from military service, it was purchased by the Kern County Sheriff's Department in June 1997. According to the Sheriff's Department, the helicopter had accrued 8,036 hours of total flight time on the date of the accident. The helicopter was maintained utilizing the manufacturer's inspection program, the last inspection of which occurred on March 17, 2014, 36 flight hours prior to the accident. The helicopter was not equipped with instruments certified for instrument flight rules; it was equipped with a radar altimeter. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONThe closest weather reporting station was located at Tehachapi. Five minutes before departure it reported wind from 300 degrees at 15 knots with gusts to 22 knots, 7 miles visibility, broken ceiling at 500 ft agl, overcast skies at 1,300 ft agl, temperature 4 degrees C, dew point temperature 4 degrees C, altimeter 29.93 inHg. At 0135, the visibility remained the same, with scattered clouds at 400 ft agl, broken ceiling at 800 ft agl, and overcast skies at 1,700 ft agl. Next Generation Radar (NEXRAD) LEVEL-II data imagery for the period 1245 to 0158 revealed rain showers forming and moving eastward into the mountainous terrain east of Bakersfield. An area forecast, issued about 6 hours prior to the accident, indicated rain showers and ceilings near 3,000 ft for Bakersfield, along with isolated showers for the mountains and 20 knots wind, gusting to 30 knots. An AIRMET was also issued about that time indicating mountain obscuration and turbulence. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe helicopter was manufactured by Bell Helicopters in October 1970 and delivered to the United States Army at the end of that month. After being retired from military service, it was purchased by the Kern County Sheriff's Department in June 1997. According to the Sheriff's Department, the helicopter had accrued 8,036 hours of total flight time on the date of the accident. The helicopter was maintained utilizing the manufacturer's inspection program, the last inspection of which occurred on March 17, 2014, 36 flight hours prior to the accident. The helicopter was not equipped with instruments certified for instrument flight rules; it was equipped with a radar altimeter. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNight Vision Goggles All ASU pilots received training in the use of NVG's during the period from 2006 through 2009 by Aviation Specialties Unlimited of Boise, Idaho. All subsequent recurrent training was performed by both the accident pilot and the deputy flight instructor, who both then cross-train each other for currency. All pilots are required to maintain currency every 90 days. The accident pilot did not recall any specific training which warned of the adverse effects of windshield fogging while using NVG's. He stated that the windshield demister was turned off at takeoff, and that this was required by checklist because it utilized engine bleed air. According to representatives from Aviation Specialties Unlimited, windscreen condition and its effects on NVG performance are discussed during training. Additionally, the 2008 ground school student handout stated the following in the section entitled, "Indications of Restrictions to Visibility at Night": "NOTE: Aviators may fail to detect a gradual increase in cloud coverage (fog, haze, or precipitation) and may inadvertently enter the clouds. Occasionally look under the goggles (unaided) and check for indications of deteriorating weather conditions." The Part 135 Operations section of the most current student handout specifically states the following, "Inspect aircraft windscreen and windows for condition and cleanliness. Particular attention should be paid to ensure that the windscreen and windows do not have a layer of dust on the exterior or haze that can form on the interior of the windscreen. A light layer of dust or haze, just like light fog or mist, can significantly degrade visual acuity." Radar Altimeter The radar altimeter was an analog type, with a needle which triggered both an audible and visual warning when its altitude was reached. The pilot reported that the audible and visual alerts were turned off at the time of the accident. He stated that his standard practice when flying the UH-1 helicopter on SAR missions is to set the altimeter to a pre-determined hoisting height, and that for the accident flight he would most likely have set it to trigger at 300 feet, thereby giving him ample opportunity to react. He conceded, however, that not setting it for this flight was an oversight, and that the urgency of the mission could have contributed to this. He further stated that complacency was a possible factor due to the excellent situational awareness typically provided by NVG's. He stated that setting the radar altimeter is not a checklist item because it is mission specific, but that it should be added to the checklist, possibly in the form of "set radar altimeter trigger as needed." He further noted that some pilots prefer not to set or arm the radar altimeter due to the distracting beeping sound it creates. Weather Minima The ASU operations manual, Helicopter - Prohibited Operations section, stated that night mountain operations with ceiling or visibility less than 1,000 ft agl and 3 statute miles are strictly prohibited. In the Operator/Owner Safety Recommendation section of the NTSB Form 6120.1 "PILOT/OPERATOR AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT", the pilot stated that the accident could have been have been prevented by: "Obtain[ing] a complete official weather briefing in person. Avoid flight operations in marginal weather conditions at night." ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONThe ASU was comprised of six pilots and three TFO's. Depending on availability, the pilots would also perform the duties of a TFO. The unit also drew on the resources of a group of search and rescue (SAR) volunteers. Two of the pilots were instrument rated. Depending on the day of the week, the ASU shared aviation related SAR responsibilities with the Kern County Fire Department. With the fire department providing support Monday through Wednesday, and the ASU covering the remaining four days. The ASU operated three fixed wing aircraft, and five helicopters, which included two Bell OH-58's, two McDonnell Douglas MD 500's, and one Bell UH-1. Most of the routine and scheduled maintenance was performed by mechanics in-house. According to the operations manual, the ASU was managed by an officer-in-charge (OIC), with training scheduling, oversight, and planning performed by the chief flight instructor. According to the manual, a position of Safety Officer had been created to "Establish a safety manual, safety practices, and to provide recommendations for the OIC regarding safety items." However, the OIC revealed that a Safety Officer had not been assigned, and that the safety manual only contained broad safety objectives that were not specific to ASU operations. There was no formal safety management system (SMS) in place beyond verbal and written discrepancy reports to the OIC and chief flight instructor. According to the pilot, there was no specific risk assessment procedure prior to flight, primarily because most flights are routine in nature. Airborne Law Enforcement Association Standards The Airborne Law Enforcement Association (ALEA) is a non-profit association comprised of local, state, and international public aircraft operators. The association's mission is to "promote and advance safe, effective and efficient aviation operations in public safety through voluntary compliance with Commission standards validated through the accreditation process." The ALEA provide a series of guidelines and resources, which a public operator may choose to utilize as either an operations template, or towards accreditation. According to an ALEA representative, the organization has over 3,000 members, and eight public operators have attained accreditation. According to the OIC, although the ASU has not attained accreditation, all of the pilots are members, and typically two or three attend ALEA conferences annually.
The pilot's decision to attempt a mission at night with known en route weather conditions below operating minimums, likely due to self-induced pressure, and then continue flight beyond the alternate landing airport as weather conditions deteriorated, which resulted in the pilot experiencing spatial disorientation. Contributing to the accident were the pilot's fatigue, his failure to recognize that mist had formed on the inner surface of the windshield, his complacency due to the effectiveness of the night vision goggles, and his failure to use the radar altimeter.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
