Waterloo, IL, USA
N442JE
ROBINSON HELICOPTER COMPANY R44 II
The pilot reported that he was maneuvering at low altitude to apply fungicide to a corn field. The collective flight control stiffened to a point that the pilot was unable to arrest the helicopter’s descent rate. The pilot attempted to use cyclic control to flare the helicopter and arrest the descent; however, the cyclic control was not responsive, and the helicopter impacted the ground. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the tail boom, fuselage, and main rotor system. The pilot stated that he suspected that the flight controls’ hydraulic assist system malfunctioned. During the on-site inspection, no obvious anomalies were found with the flight control system. Flight control continuity was confirmed on site. All 3 servos (2 forward and 1 aft) passed bench functionality tests and the hydraulic pump, reservoir, and fluids were normal. The right forward servo had a slightly bent piston shaft, but still was fully functional. The bent shaft was consistent with impact damage. The spool drives of each servo were examined and exhibited signatures consistent with normal operation. An examination of the hydraulic system components revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operations. The reason for the reported flight control malfunction could not be determined.
On July 22, 2022, about 0920 central daylight time, a Robinson R44 helicopter, N442JE, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Waterloo, Illinois. The pilot was not injured. The helicopter was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 137 as an aerial application flight. The pilot reported that he was in a descent approaching a field to apply fungicide to a corn field. The collective flight control stiffened to a point that the pilot was unable to arrest the helicopter’s descent rate. The pilot attempted to use cyclic control to flare the helicopter and arrest the descent; however, the cyclic control was not responsive. The helicopter’s skids contacted the ground, which resulted in a rollover and cartwheel as the main rotors impacted the ground. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the tail boom, fuselage, and main rotor system. The pilot stated that he suspected that the flight controls’ hydraulic assist system malfunctioned. During the on-site inspection, no obvious anomalies were found with the flight control system. Collective, cyclic, and anti-torque pedals were all connected and appeared to be normal. Flight control continuity was confirmed from the cockpit to the main rotor swashplate linkages and main rotor blades. Flight control continuity was confirmed from the cockpit anti-torque pedals to the tail rotor gearbox and tail rotor linkages. The hydraulic components were removed for detailed examinations. All 3 servos (2 forward and 1 aft) passed bench functionality tests. The hydraulic pump, reservoir, and fluids were normal. The forward right servo had a slightly bent piston shaft, but still was fully functional. The spool drives of the forward and aft servos exhibited signatures with normal operations. No anomalies were found that would preclude normal operation.
The malfunction of the flight controls for undetermined reasons.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
