Aviation Accident Summaries

Aviation Accident Summary CEN23FA057

Cleburne, TX, USA

Aircraft #1

N8149Z

CESSNA 210-5(205)

Analysis

The pilot, who held a commercial rating, and passenger, who held an airline transport pilot (ATP) rating, departed in the morning on a multi-leg personal flight. They accumulated about 8.5 hours of flight time that day, having stopped at 2 en route airports for fuel. Their final landing, which occurred in the evening after dark, was at an airport located about 21 miles from their destination. The pilots communicated to the airplane owner that they had stopped for additional fuel in the event of a missed approach at their final destination. Before takeoff, they received an instrument flight rules (IFR) clearance, which consisted of an assigned heading of 090 and a climb to 3,000 ft above mean sea level (msl). The airplane departed and no further communications from the pilots was recorded by air traffic control. ADS-B data indicated that after departure, the airplane climbed to 1,775 ft msl and began a right turn, which was opposite the direction of their destination. After turning about 90°, the airplane made a rapid descending right turn, and the recorded data showed the airplane at 1,275 ft msl (505 ft above ground level [agl]). The airplane continued to descend until it impacted a vacant construction site in a right-wing-low orientation. The airplane came to rest about 80 ft from the initial impact point. A postimpact fire consumed most of the wreckage. Nearby surveillance video captured audio of the airplane’s departure and both audio and video of the accident sequence. During the video, no abnormal engine sounds were heard. A witness located near the accident location stated that the airplane appeared to be at a “low altitude, right-hand bank at a high rate of speed” just before the impact. He stated that the engine sounded as if it was operating at a high power setting. The airplane impacted a vacant construction site and a postimpact fire consumed a majority of the wreckage. At the time of the accident, the departure airport was reporting instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) with an overcast ceiling at 300 ft and visibility of 2.5 statute miles. Astronomical twilight had ended at 1851, about two hours before the accident, with night instrument conditions prevailing at the time of departure Conditions were cloudy from about 1,300 ft through 4,200 ft agl. Although the postaccident examination of the airframe and engine was limited due to the significant impact and fire damage, the examination revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The airplane’s flight instruments and avionics were destroyed during the accident and were unable to be functionally tested. The investigation was unable to determine which pilot was manipulating the flight controls at the time of the accident. An aircraft performance study showed that the airplane tracked the extended centerline of the runway then began a right turn. About 20 seconds later, the airplane was descending rapidly, the airspeed was increasing through 140 kts, the pitch angle was decreasing past -10°, and the roll angle was increasing past 60°. The descent rate exceeded 11,000 ft/min. The total calculated energy showed a steady increase over the course of the flight consistent with the engine operating at a high power setting. The rapid descent after the initial right turn was consistent with the pilot experiencing spatial disorientation in night instrument conditions, which resulted in a loss of control and high-speed impact with terrain. Given the long day of flying, and the night instrument conditions encountered during departure, it is likely that the pilot experienced spatial disorientation and lost control of the airplane.

Factual Information

HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn December 4, 2022, about 2056 central standard time (CST), a Cessna 210-5 airplane, N8149Z, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Cleburne, Texas. Both pilots were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 personal flight. The airplane departed Fairmont Municipal Airport, Fairmont, West Virginia, about 1016 (all times converted to CST), en route to a planned final destination of Granbury Regional Airport (GDJ), Granbury, Texas.  Recorded ADS-B data revealed that the airplane landed at Upshur County Municipal Airport, Buckhannon, West Virginia, about 1033. Fueling records indicate that 41.49 gallons of fuel were purchased. The airplane departed about 1109 and returned to the airport about 1115. An additional 16.96 gallons of fuel were purchased. About 1133, the airplane departed again and flew to the Covington Municipal Airport, Covington, Tennessee, where it landed about 1527. About 1615, the airplane departed and landed at Cleburne Regional Airport (CPT), Cleburne, Texas, about 2022. While at CPT, the pilots communicated with the owner of the airplane and informed him that they had stopped for additional fuel to ensure they would have enough in the event of a missed approach at GDJ. An IFR flight plan was filed for a flight from CPT to GDJ. The pilots subsequently received their IFR clearance from air traffic control, which consisted of an assigned heading of 090 and instruction to climb to 3,000 ft msl. They subsequently departed from CPT about 2055. No further communications from the crew were received by air traffic control. Recorded ADS-B data indicated that after departure from runway 15, the airplane climbed to about 1,775 ft msl and began a right turn. After turning about 90°, a rapid descent began as the airplane continued the right turn. The last ADS-B data point was recorded when the airplane was about 1,275 ft msl (505 ft agl). Surveillance video from about ¾ mile northeast of the accident location captured audio of the airplane’s departure and both audio and video of the impact. During the video, no abnormal engine sounds were heard. A witness, located about 300 yards southeast of the accident location, stated that the airplane appeared to be at a “low altitude, right-hand bank at a high rate of speed” just before the impact. He stated that the engine sounded as if it was operating at a high power setting. The airplane impacted a vacant construction site on a 340° ground track in a right-wing-low orientation. The initial point of impact was identified by remnants of the right navigation light lens and right wingtip. The airplane continued on the same track and the main wreckage was located about 80 ft from the initial impact point, with the total debris field extending about 240 ft. During the impact sequence, the airplane was fragmented and was mostly consumed by fire. A performance study was completed that showed the first ADS-B data point was recorded at 20:55:06, with the airplane near the midpoint of runway 15. The airplane reached an altitude where it would have entered the overcast ceiling about 20:55:35, and it continued to climb until it reached a maximum altitude of about 1,870 ft msl at 20:56:13. The airplane tracked the extended centerline of the runway until 20:56:00, when it began a right turn. By 20:56:20, the airplane was descending rapidly, the airspeed was increasing through 140 kts, the pitch angle was decreasing past -10°, and the roll angle was increasing past 60°. The calculated normal load factor increased, but did not exceed 2, and the longitudinal load factor remained near zero. The descent rate exceeded 11,000 ft/min, and the final ADS-B data point was recorded at 20:56:26. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe commercial pilot was listed as the pilot-in-command on the IFR flight plan for the accident flight. Review of the commercial pilot’s digital flight logbook showed 26.9 hours of night flying since October 18, 2016, 2.8 hours of actual instrument, and 0.4 hour of simulated instrument flight time. Review of the ATP pilot’s flight logbook showed no logged flights since May 17, 2022, in small, less than 12,500 lb max takeoff weight, single or multi-engine airplanes. Since May 2022, the ATP pilot had received initial training in an Embraer Phenom 300 for a Title 14 CFR Part 135 operator. Additionally, the pilot had 72.4 hours of night flying, 14.8 hours of actual instrument, and 73.8 hours of simulated instrument flight time. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONAt 2035, the CPT AWOS reported a wind from 150° at 6 knots, visibility of 5 statute miles, mist, an overcast ceiling at 300 ft agl, a temperature of 10° Celsius (C) and dew point temperature of 10°C, and an altimeter setting of 30.10 inches of mercury (remarks indicated that it was an automated station without a precipitation discriminator). At 2055, the CPT AWOS reported a wind from 160° at 7 knots, visibility of 2 1/2 statute miles, mist, an overcast ceiling at 300 ft agl, a temperature of 10° C and dew point temperature of 10°C, and an altimeter setting of 30.10 inches of mercury (remarks indicated that it was an automated station without a precipitation discriminator). A High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model sounding for near the accident site at 2100, using an elevation of 763 ft, was retrieved from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Air Resources Laboratory and analyzed by the RAwinsonde OBservation (RAOB) program. Cloudy conditions were identified by RAOB in the lower atmosphere from about 1,300 ft through 4,200 ft agl. The wind nearest the surface was from the south-southeast about 5 kts, but the wind increased in magnitude to a southwest wind of about 30 kts near 2,800 ft agl. RAOB identified light low-level wind shear throughout most of a layer between about 800 and 2,200 ft agl. Light or moderate turbulence was noted between about 1,250 and 7,400 ft agl. Temperature inversions were noted between about 1,250 and 3,500 ft and between about 4,250 and 7,350 ft agl. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONA postaccident examination confirmed flight control continuity from the cockpit to the rudder, elevator, and the left aileron through tension overload separations of the control cables. The right aileron control continuity was partially established with a small section of the direct cable not observed at the time of the examination. The breaks observed were consistent with tension overload and the right aileron cables remained attached to the bellcrank and control chain. The engine was examined with a borescope with no pre-impact anomalies noted. The wing spar forward and aft attach points revealed no evidence of fatigue or corrosion. The vacuum pump revealed no preimpact anomalies. Extensive impact and fire damage precluded functional testing of the airplane systems. MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATIONPilot The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME), Tarrant County Medical Examiner’s District, performed the commercial pilot’s autopsy. According to the autopsy report, the pilot’s cause of death was blunt force injuries. The manner of death was accident. Due to the extent of injuries the brain was unavailable for examination and examination of heart and lungs was limited. Within these limitations, the autopsy did not identify evidence of significant natural disease. The OCME performed toxicological testing of postmortem muscle of the commercial pilot. No tested-for substances were detected. The FAA Forensic Sciences Laboratory performed toxicological testing of postmortem tissue specimens of the pilot. No tested-for substances were detected. Pilot-rated passenger The OCME, Tarrant County Medical Examiner’s District, performed the airline transport pilot’s autopsy. According to the autopsy report, the pilot’s cause of death was blunt force injuries. The manner of death was accident. Autopsy evaluation for natural disease was limited by the extent of injuries. The brain was unavailable for examination. Within these limitations, the autopsy did not identify evidence of significant natural disease. The OCME performed postmortem toxicological testing of cavity blood of the airline transport pilot. Diphenhydramine was detected at 58 ng/mL. No other tested-for substances were detected. The FAA Forensic Sciences Laboratory performed toxicological testing of postmortem cavity blood, muscle, and liver tissue of the airline transport pilot. Quetiapine was detected in liver tissue at 17 ng/g but not in blood. Hydroxyzine was detected in liver tissue at 6 ng/g but not in blood. Diphenhydramine was detected in liver tissue at 17 ng/g and cavity blood at 57 ng/mL. Dextromethorphan and dextrophan were detected in liver tissue and cavity blood. Quetiapine, sometimes marketed as Seroquel, is a prescription antipsychotic medication. In the United States, quetiapine is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating schizophrenia. Quetiapine is also FDA-approved for treating acute episodes of mania and depression in bipolar disorder, and as part of chronic multi-drug treatment of bipolar disorder. Additionally, quetiapine is approved as part of multi-drug treatment of major depressive disorder. Quetiapine is regularly prescribed for off-label (non-FDA-approved) uses, including, in low doses, treatment of insomnia without an underlying psychiatric illness. Some other possible off-label uses include chronic single-drug treatment of bipolar disorder, as well treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety. Quetiapine may also be misused or abused, often in combination with other recreational substances. Quetiapine commonly causes drowsiness, especially in the initial days after starting a treatment regimen; users may develop tolerance to this effect over time. Quetiapine typically carries a warning that it has the potential to impair judgment, thinking, and motor skills, and that users should be cautioned about performing activities requiring mental alertness, such as operating a motor vehicle or hazardous machinery, until they are reasonably certain that the drug does not affect them adversely. The FAA considers quetiapine to be a “Do Not Issue/Do Not Fly” medication. According to the FAA medical case review for this accident, quetiapine is unacceptable for FAA medical certification. Hydroxyzine is a prescription medication that can be used to treat anxiety, as well as pruritis (itching) due to allergies. Hydroxyzine usually carries a warning that users may experience drowsiness and should use caution when driving a motor vehicle or operating machinery. Caution is advised in using hydroxyzine and diphenhydramine at the same time as severe adverse drug reactions can occur. These include severe cardiac rhythm abnormalities, increased drowsiness, dry mouth, and confusion. The FAA states that anti-anxiety medications are “Do Not Issue/Do Not Fly” medications both for their sedating effects and the potentially underlying conditions being treated. Diphenhydramine is a sedating antihistamine medication widely available over the counter in multiple sleep aids and cold and allergy products. Diphenhydramine can cause drowsiness, decrease reaction time, and impair attention and memory. It often carries a warning that caution should be taken when performing tasks such as driving and operating machinery. The FAA states that pilots should not fly within 60 hours of using diphenhydramine, to allow time for it to be cleared from circulation. Dextromethorphan is an over-the-counter cough suppressant found in numerous common cough syrups and cold medications. Dextromethorphan is not typically impairing at levels associated with medicinal use. The FAA states that pilots should not fly after using dextromethorphan until at least five dosage intervals have elapsed, to allow time for the drug to be cleared from circulation. Dextrorphan is a metabolite of dextromethorphan.

Probable Cause and Findings

An in-flight loss of control as a result of spatial disorientation in night instrument meteorological conditions.

 

Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database

Get all the details on your iPhone or iPad with:

Aviation Accidents App

In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports